Search Pitcher

Bubic, Kris

LHP

Team: Kansas City RoyalsThrows: LHeight: 6'3"Weight: 220 lbDOB: Aug 19, 1997Born: Cupertino, CA, USAActive

Games

3.74

ERA

11.3%

K-BB%

91.6 mph

FB Velo

27.2%

CSW%

Stuff+

102

vL 105▲vR 99

DLoc+

vL 96vR 95▼

Stockyard PLoc+

—

MLB season projection

Projects next-year DLoc+

Pitching+

100

vL 103vR 97

Deception

—

2024+ only

Synergy

—

Min. 40 IP

Mix+

—

Min. 40 IP

Match+

—

Min. 40 IP

Pitch Arsenal

Click a pitch to collapse or expand details

4-Seam Fastball

42.5%|P+99

Velocity

91.6mph

Spin

2410rpm

CSW%

25.9%

iVB / iHB

17.4" / 2.5"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

104

93▼

vs R

104

100

Changeup

21.8%|P+109▲

Velocity

85.9mph

Spin

1541rpm

CSW%

24.8%

iVB / iHB

0" / 9.6"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

102

112▲

vs R

106▲

Sweeper

14.5%|P+101

PLoc+

97-> 2027

Velocity

82.3mph

Spin

2633rpm

CSW%

35.9%

iVB / iHB

-4.2" / -13.7"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

104

100

103

vs R

100

Sinker

11.5%|P+100

Velocity

91.1mph

Spin

2261rpm

CSW%

21%

iVB / iHB

8.7" / 12.8"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

104

106▲

103

vs R

100

Slider

9.7%|P+99

Velocity

85.2mph

Spin

2530rpm

CSW%

38.5%

iVB / iHB

-1.7" / -2.1"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

106▲

92▼

100

vs R

93▼

95▼

xRV (Expected Run Value): Expected runs per 100 pitches using xwOBA on batted balls (BABIP-neutral). Negative = good (runs prevented), Positive = bad (runs allowed).

Similar Pitchers

Game Log

Last 30 games in 2026

Search Pitcher

Bubic, Kris

LHP

Team: Kansas City RoyalsThrows: LHeight: 6'3"Weight: 220 lbDOB: Aug 19, 1997Born: Cupertino, CA, USAActive

Games

3.74

ERA

11.3%

K-BB%

91.6 mph

FB Velo

27.2%

CSW%

Stuff+

102

vL 105▲vR 99

DLoc+

vL 96vR 95▼

Stockyard PLoc+

—

MLB season projection

Projects next-year DLoc+

Pitching+

100

vL 103vR 97

Deception

—

2024+ only

Synergy

—

Min. 40 IP

Mix+

—

Min. 40 IP

Match+

—

Min. 40 IP

Pitch Arsenal

Click a pitch to collapse or expand details

4-Seam Fastball

42.5%|P+99

Velocity

91.6mph

Spin

2410rpm

CSW%

25.9%

iVB / iHB

17.4" / 2.5"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

104

93▼

vs R

104

100

Changeup

21.8%|P+109▲

Velocity

85.9mph

Spin

1541rpm

CSW%

24.8%

iVB / iHB

0" / 9.6"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

102

112▲

vs R

106▲

Sweeper

14.5%|P+101

PLoc+

97-> 2027

Velocity

82.3mph

Spin

2633rpm

CSW%

35.9%

iVB / iHB

-4.2" / -13.7"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

104

100

103

vs R

100

Sinker

11.5%|P+100

Velocity

91.1mph

Spin

2261rpm

CSW%

21%

iVB / iHB

8.7" / 12.8"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

104

106▲

103

vs R

100

Slider

9.7%|P+99

Velocity

85.2mph

Spin

2530rpm

CSW%

38.5%

iVB / iHB

-1.7" / -2.1"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

106▲

92▼

100

vs R

93▼

95▼

xRV (Expected Run Value): Expected runs per 100 pitches using xwOBA on batted balls (BABIP-neutral). Negative = good (runs prevented), Positive = bad (runs allowed).

Pitch Visualizations

Pitch Usage

Usage by Batter Hand

Movement Profile (Induced Break)

Pitching+ by Pitch TypeThe overall grade and per-pitch grades are rescaled independently against different populations. Per-pitch grades compare a pitcher's sinker to all sinkers, slider to all sliders, etc. The overall grade compares a pitcher's total pitch mix against all pitchers. Because averaging across pitch types reduces variance, the overall population is tighter — so the same raw advantage gets amplified more. A pitcher who is consistently above average on every pitch will have an overall grade higher than any individual pitch grade.

Arm Slot

Season Trends

Game-by-game performance across the season

Similar Pitchers

Game Log

Last 30 games in 2026

Pitch Visualizations

Pitch Usage

Usage by Batter Hand

Movement Profile (Induced Break)

Pitching+ by Pitch TypeThe overall grade and per-pitch grades are rescaled independently against different populations. Per-pitch grades compare a pitcher's sinker to all sinkers, slider to all sliders, etc. The overall grade compares a pitcher's total pitch mix against all pitchers. Because averaging across pitch types reduces variance, the overall population is tighter — so the same raw advantage gets amplified more. A pitcher who is consistently above average on every pitch will have an overall grade higher than any individual pitch grade.