Search Pitcher

Myers, Tobias

RHP

Team: New York MetsThrows: RHeight: 6'1"Weight: 223 lbDOB: Aug 5, 1998Born: Winter Haven, FL, USAActive

Games

2.33

ERA

20.3%

K-BB%

92.3 mph

FB Velo

27.8%

CSW%

Stuff+

102

vL 103vR 101

DLoc+

102

vL 103vR 102

Stockyard PLoc+

—

MLB season projection

Projects next-year DLoc+

Pitching+

105

vL 105▲vR 106▲

Deception

—

2024+ only

Synergy

—

Min. 40 IP

Mix+

—

Min. 40 IP

Match+

—

Min. 40 IP

Pitch Arsenal

Click a pitch to collapse or expand details

4-Seam Fastball

45.4%|P+106▲

Velocity

92.3mph

Spin

2219rpm

CSW%

27.7%

iVB / iHB

20.4" / 4.5"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

106▲

101

105▲

vs R

100

102

106▲

Split-Finger

22.5%|P+106▲

Velocity

79.8mph

Spin

1449rpm

CSW%

23.7%

iVB / iHB

8.3" / 9.4"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

109▲

101

106▲

vs R

107▲

101

106▲

Slider

18.3%|P+95▼

Velocity

82.2mph

Spin

2117rpm

CSW%

20.8%

iVB / iHB

0.6" / -5.9"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

94▼

vs R

94▼

Cutter

9.2%|P+102

Velocity

86.3mph

Spin

2138rpm

CSW%

33.3%

iVB / iHB

12.6" / -5.9"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

103

101

vs R

94▼

101

102

Curveball

4.6%|P+—

Velocity

80mph

Spin

2116rpm

CSW%

16.7%

iVB / iHB

-1" / -5"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

—

vs R

—

xRV (Expected Run Value): Expected runs per 100 pitches using xwOBA on batted balls (BABIP-neutral). Negative = good (runs prevented), Positive = bad (runs allowed).

Similar Pitchers

Game Log

Last 30 games in 2026

Search Pitcher

Myers, Tobias

RHP

Team: New York MetsThrows: RHeight: 6'1"Weight: 223 lbDOB: Aug 5, 1998Born: Winter Haven, FL, USAActive

Games

2.33

ERA

20.3%

K-BB%

92.3 mph

FB Velo

27.8%

CSW%

Stuff+

102

vL 103vR 101

DLoc+

102

vL 103vR 102

Stockyard PLoc+

—

MLB season projection

Projects next-year DLoc+

Pitching+

105

vL 105▲vR 106▲

Deception

—

2024+ only

Synergy

—

Min. 40 IP

Mix+

—

Min. 40 IP

Match+

—

Min. 40 IP

Pitch Arsenal

Click a pitch to collapse or expand details

4-Seam Fastball

45.4%|P+106▲

Velocity

92.3mph

Spin

2219rpm

CSW%

27.7%

iVB / iHB

20.4" / 4.5"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

106▲

101

105▲

vs R

100

102

106▲

Split-Finger

22.5%|P+106▲

Velocity

79.8mph

Spin

1449rpm

CSW%

23.7%

iVB / iHB

8.3" / 9.4"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

109▲

101

106▲

vs R

107▲

101

106▲

Slider

18.3%|P+95▼

Velocity

82.2mph

Spin

2117rpm

CSW%

20.8%

iVB / iHB

0.6" / -5.9"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

94▼

vs R

94▼

Cutter

9.2%|P+102

Velocity

86.3mph

Spin

2138rpm

CSW%

33.3%

iVB / iHB

12.6" / -5.9"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

103

101

vs R

94▼

101

102

Curveball

4.6%|P+—

Velocity

80mph

Spin

2116rpm

CSW%

16.7%

iVB / iHB

-1" / -5"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

—

vs R

—

xRV (Expected Run Value): Expected runs per 100 pitches using xwOBA on batted balls (BABIP-neutral). Negative = good (runs prevented), Positive = bad (runs allowed).

Pitch Visualizations

Pitch Usage

Curveball 4.6%

Usage by Batter Hand

Movement Profile (Induced Break)

Pitching+ by Pitch TypeThe overall grade and per-pitch grades are rescaled independently against different populations. Per-pitch grades compare a pitcher's sinker to all sinkers, slider to all sliders, etc. The overall grade compares a pitcher's total pitch mix against all pitchers. Because averaging across pitch types reduces variance, the overall population is tighter — so the same raw advantage gets amplified more. A pitcher who is consistently above average on every pitch will have an overall grade higher than any individual pitch grade.

Arm Slot

Season Trends

Game-by-game performance across the season

Similar Pitchers

Game Log

Last 30 games in 2026

Pitch Visualizations

Pitch Usage

Curveball 4.6%

Usage by Batter Hand

Movement Profile (Induced Break)

Pitching+ by Pitch TypeThe overall grade and per-pitch grades are rescaled independently against different populations. Per-pitch grades compare a pitcher's sinker to all sinkers, slider to all sliders, etc. The overall grade compares a pitcher's total pitch mix against all pitchers. Because averaging across pitch types reduces variance, the overall population is tighter — so the same raw advantage gets amplified more. A pitcher who is consistently above average on every pitch will have an overall grade higher than any individual pitch grade.