Search Pitcher

Manaea, Sean

LHP

Team: New York MetsThrows: LHeight: 6'5"Weight: 245 lbDOB: Feb 1, 1992Born: Valparaiso, IN, USAActive

Games

4.66

ERA

16.2%

K-BB%

89.7 mph

FB Velo

27.5%

CSW%

Stuff+

104

vL 109▲vR 100

DLoc+

vL 85▼vR 79▼

Stockyard PLoc+

—

MLB season projection

Projects next-year DLoc+

Pitching+

108

vL 110▲vR 106▲

Deception

—

2024+ only

Synergy

—

Min. 40 IP

Mix+

—

Min. 40 IP

Match+

—

Min. 40 IP

Pitch Arsenal

Click a pitch to collapse or expand details

4-Seam Fastball

43.2%|P+108▲

Velocity

89.7mph

Spin

2026rpm

CSW%

29.3%

iVB / iHB

11.2" / 14"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

91▼

108▲

vs R

90▼

108▲

Sweeper

35.4%|P+104

Velocity

74.5mph

Spin

2201rpm

CSW%

26.8%

iVB / iHB

3.7" / -12.7"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

115▲

88▼

105▲

vs R

107▲

86▼

103

Sinker

12.7%|P+91▼

Velocity

88.8mph

Spin

1990rpm

CSW%

25%

iVB / iHB

4.9" / 20.2"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

111▲

vs R

95▼

89▼

87▼

Changeup

7.2%|P+104

Velocity

82.3mph

Spin

1505rpm

CSW%

12%

iVB / iHB

1.5" / 15.8"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

101

94▼

105▲

vs R

90▼

102

Cutter

1.4%|P+—

Velocity

84mph

Spin

2121rpm

CSW%

20%

iVB / iHB

7.6" / -0.2"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

—

vs R

—

xRV (Expected Run Value): Expected runs per 100 pitches using xwOBA on batted balls (BABIP-neutral). Negative = good (runs prevented), Positive = bad (runs allowed).

Similar Pitchers

Game Log

Last 30 games in 2026

Search Pitcher

Manaea, Sean

LHP

Team: New York MetsThrows: LHeight: 6'5"Weight: 245 lbDOB: Feb 1, 1992Born: Valparaiso, IN, USAActive

Games

4.66

ERA

16.2%

K-BB%

89.7 mph

FB Velo

27.5%

CSW%

Stuff+

104

vL 109▲vR 100

DLoc+

vL 85▼vR 79▼

Stockyard PLoc+

—

MLB season projection

Projects next-year DLoc+

Pitching+

108

vL 110▲vR 106▲

Deception

—

2024+ only

Synergy

—

Min. 40 IP

Mix+

—

Min. 40 IP

Match+

—

Min. 40 IP

Pitch Arsenal

Click a pitch to collapse or expand details

4-Seam Fastball

43.2%|P+108▲

Velocity

89.7mph

Spin

2026rpm

CSW%

29.3%

iVB / iHB

11.2" / 14"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

91▼

108▲

vs R

90▼

108▲

Sweeper

35.4%|P+104

Velocity

74.5mph

Spin

2201rpm

CSW%

26.8%

iVB / iHB

3.7" / -12.7"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

115▲

88▼

105▲

vs R

107▲

86▼

103

Sinker

12.7%|P+91▼

Velocity

88.8mph

Spin

1990rpm

CSW%

25%

iVB / iHB

4.9" / 20.2"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

111▲

vs R

95▼

89▼

87▼

Changeup

7.2%|P+104

Velocity

82.3mph

Spin

1505rpm

CSW%

12%

iVB / iHB

1.5" / 15.8"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

101

94▼

105▲

vs R

90▼

102

Cutter

1.4%|P+—

Velocity

84mph

Spin

2121rpm

CSW%

20%

iVB / iHB

7.6" / -0.2"

Stuff+

DLoc+

Pitching+

vs L

—

vs R

—

xRV (Expected Run Value): Expected runs per 100 pitches using xwOBA on batted balls (BABIP-neutral). Negative = good (runs prevented), Positive = bad (runs allowed).

Pitch Visualizations

Pitch Usage

Cutter 1.4%

Usage by Batter Hand

Movement Profile (Induced Break)

Pitching+ by Pitch TypeThe overall grade and per-pitch grades are rescaled independently against different populations. Per-pitch grades compare a pitcher's sinker to all sinkers, slider to all sliders, etc. The overall grade compares a pitcher's total pitch mix against all pitchers. Because averaging across pitch types reduces variance, the overall population is tighter — so the same raw advantage gets amplified more. A pitcher who is consistently above average on every pitch will have an overall grade higher than any individual pitch grade.

Arm Slot

Season Trends

Game-by-game performance across the season

Similar Pitchers

Game Log

Last 30 games in 2026

Pitch Visualizations

Pitch Usage

Cutter 1.4%

Usage by Batter Hand

Movement Profile (Induced Break)

Pitching+ by Pitch TypeThe overall grade and per-pitch grades are rescaled independently against different populations. Per-pitch grades compare a pitcher's sinker to all sinkers, slider to all sliders, etc. The overall grade compares a pitcher's total pitch mix against all pitchers. Because averaging across pitch types reduces variance, the overall population is tighter — so the same raw advantage gets amplified more. A pitcher who is consistently above average on every pitch will have an overall grade higher than any individual pitch grade.